Thankfully, since the two generations are so similar and I could clearly see where the cover cartridge mounting points would be, I could easily guestimate the amount of bags able to fit without removing the cover cartridge.Īs with every luggage test, I use two midsize roller suitcases that would need to be checked in at the airport (26 inches long, 16 wide, 11 deep), two roll-aboard suitcases that just barely fit in the overhead (24L x 15W x 10D), and one smaller roll-aboard that fits easily (23L x 15W x 10D). It's hard to tell with the lighting and body color, but doesn't it look like the new models' liftgate has a slightly steeper angle? That could certainly explain the cubic-foot difference.Īlso, since we're doing that side-by-side: Note this test vehicle did not have a cargo cover. cause when it comes to the cargo area, it's the same car. Oh, but one more thing: you can consider this a luggage test for the 2024 Subaru Impreza. The last one was able to hold more than its volume figure would suggest, though, thanks to a usefully wide cargo area free of any odd spaces. On paper, the 2024 Crosstrek has lost 0.9 cubic-foot of space, which could be significant when we're only talking 19.9 cubes. I luggage tested the previous-generation Crosstrek, making this only the second time I'll have generation-to-generation comparisons to make (the first was the Civic Hatchback). While Zac Palmer was busy reviewing the more powerful 2024 Subaru Crosstrek Sport in New York, I was in California with a decidedly slower Crosstrek Premium stuffing it with luggage.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |